Friday, January 23, 2015

Mobile sensor deployment: making the whole greater than the sum of its’ parts.

Hosted by MEMS Industry Group and QuickLogic

Thursday, 29 January 2015 11:30 am Eastern Standard Time
In 2014, it is anticipated that 658 million sensor hubs will be sold worldwide with that number growing to 1.3 billion by 2017 (IHS Technology, April 2014). Impressive numbers for what could certainly still be considered a fledgling market. This growth is being driven by the availability of low cost sensor technology and the desire for always-on sensing allowing mobile devices to understand user context and eventually anticipate user needs.
Register for the webinar here.

Up from the archives of April 14.


Sensor Hubs Make Big Gains While Enabling the Future of Sensing

Wednesday, April 16, 2014 9:00 am EDT

Dateline:

EL SEGUNDO, Calif.
"Motion Sensors Report - Handsets and Tablets – 2014"
Sensor Hubs Make Big Gains While Enabling the Future of Sensing
El Segundo, Calif. (April 16, 2014)—Sensor hubs that offload tasks from power-hungry application processors and let mobile devices like smartphones and tablets run longer on a single battery charge are reaping gargantuan gains thanks to the global microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) market, with shipment growth this year alone in triple-digit territory, according to new analysis from IHS Technology (NYSE: IHS).
Worldwide shipments of sensor hubs in 2014 will reach a projected 658.4 million units, up 154 percent from 259.6 million units last year. The market has been on a tear since 2011, when shipments first started from a low initial base. The 2012 growth rate, for instance, exceeded 2,000 percent.
From then until 2017, the market is pegged to increase 1,300 percent to shipments of 1.3 billion units, as shown in the figure.
“A sensor hub is a low-power processor that can be used to perform calculations on data from sensors, the hub thereby saving power on a device by off-loading such tasks from the power-intensive application processor,” said Marwan Boustany, senior analyst for MEMS & sensors at IHS. “The use of sensor hubs is increasingly crucial because of the push for ‘always on’ sensors used for activity monitoring, voice-command operation and contextual awareness.”
Most of sensor processing today is performed by software running on an application processor, but this approach is too power hungry when sensor processing must continuously run in the background. With rising use by handsets and tablets of sensors—not just motion sensors but also microphones and light sensors—the need for a low-power solution becomes crucial.
By centralizing sensor processing in a more efficient way through sensor hubs, power usage and battery life are optimized, Boustany added.
These findings are contained in the report, “Motion Sensors Report - Handsets and Tablets – 2014,” from the Semiconductor & Components service of IHS.
Sensor formats vie to deliver maximum benefits
The centralized processing in a sensor hub is typically achieved via three different approaches, each with its own advantages along with specific tradeoffs in cost or performance.
One approach employs an external hub, typically a dedicated microcontroller (MCU), as offered by the likes of chip makers such as Atmel, STMicroelectronics, Texas Instruments and NXP Semiconductor.  Recent smartphones that use this approach include the Apple iPhone 5s, Samsung Galaxy S5 and the Motorola Moto X.
A second method utilizes a low-power sensor hub as part of an application processor, offered by Qualcomm, Intel and Nvidia through a low-power core—and in the future to be provided as well by Samsung’s Exynos, MediaTek and HiSilicon. Such an integrated approach has advantages compared to the discrete MCU format, reducing additional chip-design efforts and entailing no additional components, but it also cannot compare for now to the lower power delivered by MCUs.
Apple, for instance, is likely to stick to the MCU approach for its high-end product offerings, even if the MCU solution will be overtaken in the market by the application-processor integrated approach after 2016, IHS analysis shows.
A third way for implementing sensor hubs is through a package that combines both a low-power processor—typically an MCU—and one or more sensors, typically an accelerometer and gyroscope. The accelerometer and gyroscope are the most common sensor combination, allowing for various levels of activity and motion tracking, ranging from step counting to more detailed motion tracking and contextual awareness. InvenSense and STMicroelectronics are currently the main proponents of this approach, with Bosch, Freescale Semiconductor and Kionix also offering similar products.
Two new mechanisms are also on the horizon. These include a field-programmable gate array (FPGA)-based sensor hub that allows for a very low-power solution for original equipment manufacturers that can also be redesigned; and a GPS-chipset-based sensor hub that offers location-tracking-related functions in addition to motion-sensor processing. Both these formats, however, are expected during the next four years to occupy just niche positions in the handset and tablet segments in the face of relatively low volumes compared to the three other more mainstream sensor hub formats.
Overall, the MCU approach will be the best-performing, most flexible solution for high-end handsets and tablets for several development generations to come, noted Tom Hackenberg, senior analyst for MCUs & microprocessors at IHS.
Meanwhile, the application-processor-based approach will prove the most convenient for handset and tablet suppliers, making its way into the mid- to high-end range of handsets, by itself and in combination with one of the other sensor hub implementations as part of a layered solution. The Moto X is one example of a handset that takes this approach.
The combined processor and sensors approach could also straddle the midrange all the way to the high end with its potential for very-low-power operation, where it could exist by itself or in combination with a different sensor hub implementation.
“In whatever format, low-power sensor hubs are absolutely critical to supporting the expansion of sensors and other low-power capabilities in mobile and other applications, such as wearable electronics,” Hackenberg said.
Top sensor hub suppliers identified
The No. 1 supplier of sensor hubs last year was California-based Atmel, with 32 percent of total industry shipments. Next was Qualcomm, also from California, with 29 percent market share, followed by NXP of the Netherlands with 24 percent.
Other important suppliers were Dallas-based Texas Instruments; Rohm Semiconductor from Japan; French-Italian maker STMicroelectronics; and InvenSense and Nvidia, both from California.

Thursday, January 22, 2015

Kateeva joins forces with Japanese Materials leader Sumitomo Chemical

OLED industry leaders partner to accelerate adoption of inkjet RGB OLED for large-size TVs
Menlo Park, Calif., Jan. 13, 2015—Kateeva today announced a key partnership with Sumitomo Chemical Company, Ltd. (Sumitomo). Sumitomo is a global solution Organic Light Emitting Diode (OLED) materials leader. Kateeva is a leading provider of novel inkjet printing equipment for OLED mass production. The non-exclusive agreement calls for Sumitomo to pair its world-class inks with Kateeva’s world-class YIELDjet™ platform to help speed affordable OLED TVs to market.
The collaboration aims to make it easier for display manufacturers to deploy inkjet-printed Red Green Blue (RGB) OLED for large-size TVs. Success depends on achieving a perfect interaction of advanced materials and cutting-edge mass-production equipment. Kateeva and Sumitomo will cooperate to co-develop high-quality reference data for customers. They’ll leverage Sumitomo inks and Kateeva’s inkjet OLED mass-production platform to optimize the manufacturing process to achieve optimum OLED device performance. Customers that select the Kateeva/Sumitomo equipment/ink combination will benefit from the assurance of a tested and optimized solution.
Kateeva’s YIELDjet platform is a critical enabler of OLED mass production. The newly introduced YIELDjet FLEX product enables low-cost, high-yield Thin Film Encapsulation (TFE) for flexible OLED displays. It is the first product to emerge from the YIELDjet platform and offers an alternative to older less efficient vacuum evaporation technologies. The same platform can be applied to print RGB OLED TVs.
Sumitomo Chemical’s OLED material, which is the Polymer OLED (PLED) type, is suitable for printing, and enables effective mass production of large-size OLED displays. Sumitomo’s PLED material has already achieved excellent performance for TV applications, and the company is continuously improving its material performance.
Kateeva Chief Technology Officer Steven Van Slyke called the partnership a key step forward for the OLED industry. He noted: “OLED TVs have long captivated consumers but remain beyond reach for many due to high production costs. Inkjet printing can change that, given the right combination of materials and equipment. Our collaboration with Sumitomo will speed high-performance inkjet-printed OLED devices to market by optimizing industry-leading materials and equipment to mass produce reliable, affordable OLED TVs.”
Beyond flexible OLEDs, OLED TV is the next natural application for Kateeva’s YIELDjet platform. Joining forces with Sumitomo gives Kateeva a strategic lead in the fast-growing sector. The YIELDjet platform is a strong fit, particularly for its pure-nitrogen process chamber. Nitrogen is the ultimate OLED processing environment. It shields OLED materials from moisture and air (known degraders of quality), and enables consistently superior device lifetime, especially crucial T95 lifetime. T95 lifetime describes the time it takes for a display element to lose 5 percent of its initial brightness. The most difficult customer spec to meet, it determines the resilience of the display against image burn in. The innovative nitrogen processing technology found in Kateeva’s YIELDjet platform dramatically improves T95, thereby enabling customers to more rapidly move inkjet OLED into mass production.
This Kateeva/Sumitomo partnership is intentionally non-exclusive. Its broader aim is to equip the global display industry with novel tools and technologies to help mainstream OLED TVs. Kateeva and Sumitomo are free to partner with others. For their part, customers may use Sumitomo inks with non-Kateeva inkjet printers, and Kateeva inkjet printers with inks provided by non-Sumitomo vendors.
About Sumitomo Chemical Company, Ltd.
Among a broad range of chemical product lines, Sumitomo Chemical engages in developing new, highly functional materials in the fields of optics and electronics, information technology and energy. Sumitomo Chemical also focuses on research on synthesis and processing, materials design, and evaluation of physical and practical properties, which supports material development and paves the way for practical use. In addition, Sumitomo Chemical conducts R&D for devices of PLED and printed electronics with a view to developing new businesses, including downstream businesses. www.sumitomo-chem.co.jp/english/

About Kateeva, Inc.

Kateeva makes breakthrough production equipment for manufacturers of advanced electronics technologies. The company has pioneered a precision deposition technology platform that uses innovative inkjet printing to deposit coatings on complex applications with blinding speed and superb accuracy. Technology leaders use Kateeva’s solution to enable cost-effective mass production of flexible and large-size OLED displays, among other cutting-edge products. Kateeva is headquartered in Silicon Valley, maintains operations in Korea, and is backed by leading Venture Capital firms and other investors. www.kateeva.com.


Give it a listen.....

Mobile sensor deployment: making the whole greater than the sum of its parts (Webinar)

Jan 29, 2015 
11:30 AM ET

 Listen to webcast


Now that they have the bits and pieces, the S2, the algos, the context classification, the refrence designs, they can have nice show and tell.  Build that ecosystem with names, both big OEM,s and the kickstarters with good ideas.  Help them all.


Can be skipped as it can cause a digression headache. But digressive reading IS VERY useful.
Here are the tidbits I got for the time….
“The power delta between M0 and M4 is so small, and the M4 will execute faster and so shut off more quickly,” said Salas.
Add in the stuff from NXP dual core.
Can’t do fusion.
And the M4 is more responsive.
The M0+ alone or in a dual core is NOT much of a product.
The F in M4F indicates the CPU has floating point extensions. “This is tremendously valuable for the IoT where sensors are on all the time. Floating point helps with the analytics algorithms,” said Salas. “The other bonus is that customers who use Matlab generally have to take the code and convert to fixed-point for smaller code and lower energy. We save customers the float-to-fixed conversion.” – See more at:
See they NEED that FPU. QUIK will have 2 math units in their design.
So again if there are ways to further cut the power for the roadmap, with new technologies that are ready for prime time- QUIK has it on their R & D bench. They hired for that skill set last yr.