Saturday, February 14, 2015

http://www.wired.com/2015/02/the-future-of-wearable-tech/

JEN QUINLAN, RITHMIO

Our Mission

Analysts contend there will be billions  of connected products that can sense motion shipped by 2020. From smartphones to wearables, we’re swimming in motion-sensing data, however many product teams struggle with accurately interpreting motion data as a specific gesture an end-user completed.
The Rithmio team is hard at work building a platform for gesture recognition and control. Our software integrates with any motion sensing device to learn, track and analyze gestures. With award-winning technology that has been validated by Fortune 500 brands to leading manufacturers, we aspire to become the world’s leading platform for gesture recognition and control.
Many yawn at wearables as nothing of any significance......

what is wrong that?

A few things.....

1.  They are part of an ecosystem now.  If you want to be a major player in the mobile device, you better offer all the mobile devices...smartphones and the smartwatch to go with it.  Maybe a pair of glasses.  You simply cannot afford to miss the next big thing.  Can't waste time, may not be THE device this gerneration but stay in the game till it is The device. THe Foxconn material lately shows how the mental model goes.  Its the same most everywhere else. They are far MORE important as a part of an ecosystem than the current TAM numbers.

2. No carrier qualifications.  The smartphones has to go to the FCC as QUIK mentioned in the cc.  So our flagship smartphone that has been pushed out has expanded to include the same maker's wearable platform- those devices can get to market sooner so now with every wearable we read about from a guy who also makes smartphones we will have to wonder if thats the Smartphone we will be in.

3. I actually like the idea that instead of a few devices controlling huge % of market share ( use Samsung Galaxy as a model for that) there may be 100s of wearable devices one day from many makers; some crazy thing that sells in low units, up to some fitness bands and smartwatches that sell in good numbers. Its more fun.

4. the reading of the adjacent possible, knowing the power numbers, the reference designs etc........QUIK will take a good chunk of the hubs in wearables......25-40% is my guess- my own subjective probability- I have reached this conclusion for wearables- not smartphones ( We need to see the S3 to figure that out more.)


this snip all by itself as it is so good to read a few times

Approximations of how many steps you walked will no longer suffice as people demand accurate data from their devices – including wearables.
Some things I want on the same page…
Wired snip of text…
Approximations of how many steps you walked will no longer suffice as people demand accurate data from their devices – including wearables.
We have yet to see industry standards emerge to set manufacturer guidelines and advocate on consumers’ behalf.
I anticipate advocacy boards to be formed to evaluate devices and require brands to deliver accuracy percentage guarantees. Can you picture a label on Jawbone packaging with a
‘99.5% accurate gesture tracking’ guarantee
Dr. Saxe LAST yr
Two bullet points that Dr. Saxe had in his slide deck at Lindley mobile LAST yr.
• Lower power means you can add more sensors to improve accuracy
• Off-loading computation allows more computation to improve accuracy
Bob West
Accurate pedometer data is the foundation for fitness and health
applications, as well as a growing number of applications that’s used
with other sensor data. As such, pedometer accuracy is viewed as a
critical factor by many of our perspective customers.”
And
Andy Pease has had a personal first hand taste of pedometer and fitness
ineptitude. He owns and wears multiple Wearable’s. He’s been wearing them
for over a year. He pays attention to them. Their lack of accuracy is a real
irritant to him. 
He voluntary comments on it regularly. My view is it violates
his well-honed standards of integrity and quality.
Over the course of several quarters, he has made several comments that stuck
with me. I believe them have a directly influenced QUIK’s decision to enter
the Sensor Algorithm market. Besides data accuracy, they were:
Andy P. is spot on where it matters?, ie the same thought process as is stated in the Wired article that word  accuracy, accuracy, accuracy
does matter to the future of wearables.
+ Patent Pending
consider we can do this for many more important algos…like this snip
‘99.5% accurate gesture tracking’ guarantee
thanks in advance for hitting this benchmark QUIK. Andy P. and QUIK's focus on accuracy is what I want as  part owner of their biz.  It will pay off in many ways;
In the HUGE adjacent possible of Indoor location, in the margin that comes with such quality.

Keep it up QUIK. that  accuracy, accuracy, accuracy
Nice snip right here to think over a few times………………………
Accurate. From your kids’ GPA to your own body’s BMI, our culture is getting more numbers oriented across many aspects of life.
    Approximations of how many steps you walked will no longer suffice as people demand accurate data from their devices – including wearables.
We have yet to see industry standards emerge to set manufacturer guidelines and advocate on consumers’ behalf.
    I anticipate advocacy boards to be formed to evaluate devices and require brands to deliver accuracy percentage guarantees. Can you picture a label on Jawbone packaging with a
    ‘99.5% accurate gesture tracking’ guarantee
Nice evolution and toward what we are focusing on…….
?
The sooner his happens the better for part owners of QUIKs biz.
more is here

Manufacturing Giant Foxconn Is Moving Into The Hardware Accelerator Game

Next Story

As Europe’s Online Money Transfer Market Heats Up, UK’s Azimo Expands To Germany And Ireland

Foxconn, the gargantuan manufacturer of electronics, is experimenting in the hardware accelerator market by turning an underused Nokia campus in Beijing into its first small business outreach center. The plan, as described by Foxconn Chief Investment Director Charles Pan at the TechCrunch/Technode event in Shanghai, has led one small manufacturer to market and will help others over the coming year.
The incubator, which is not completely formalized, will work with small manufacturers by bringing them in for an intensive coaching and mentorship period. Tomoon, a smart watch company, worked with Foxconn on their T-Fire e-ink smart watch, a unique Android-powered watch with a curved screen. The company moved from a simple idea to a fully-fledged product in about six weeks.
“When they came to us it was like a toy,” said Pan. He said the company helped improve the design and offered manufacturing expertise to create the final product.
There is no date set for the accelerator launch but Pan said the company is writing up standard operating procedures for the new venture. He expects that Foxconn will take some equity in exchange for the hardware help

Thursday, February 12, 2015

Notice the journals that this is in.........



High-tech pedometers do a decent job of counting steps accurately. Dina Fine Maron reports.

00:00
01:39
Sometimes it’s hard to get moving. So setting a goal for the number of steps you walk each day can be a good motivator. But how to keep track of your total? A new study finds that many of the widely available wearable step counters actually keep a pretty accurate count. The research is in JAMA.[Meredith A. Case et al, Accuracy of Smartphone Applications and Wearable Devices for Tracking Physical Activity Data]

For the study, 14 volunteers agreed to walk on treadmills while decked out with 10 popular wearable or smartphone counting technologies. The devices were compared with actual manual counts of either 500 or 1500 steps. So how’d they do?

Smartphone apps were better step trackers than wearable tech—but the wearables were not terrible either. They typically slightly undercounted, compared to manual tallies, for example.  Some of the discrepancy between the apps and wearables could be because volunteers’ phones were in a pocket close to their hips where it may be easier to pick up specific movements. But in everyday life smartphones would not always be in a pocket, of course.

Of the 10 apps or devices studied, the Fitbit One was most accurate and had good consistency.

Although none of the counts were that far off—for example, clocking just 1200 steps instead of 1500—the findings suggest that it’s probably a good idea to take the numbers as a loose estimate. And if you can’t walk somewhere, you can still feel motivated to park a few hundred steps away from your final destination.

—Dina Fine Maron 


Wednesday, February 11, 2015

Here is Andy's partial response to the cc...

Insider Buying: Andrew J. Pease Purchases 22,800 Shares of QuickLogic Stock (QUIK)


The T Jumper item..

 
SUNNYVALE, CA, Feb 11, 2015 (Marketwired via COMTEX) -- QuickLogic CorporationQUIK, +1.38%
--  Telepathy Jumper wearable targets both consumer and enterprise
    applications with its unique ability to allow users to seamlessly
    share sight and sound experiences
--  Combination of ArcticLink 3 S2 sensor hub and SenseMe software
    algorithms interprets user context and gestures at ultra-low power
--  The Telepathy Jumper was announced in Q4 2014, pre-release orders now
    being accepted


QuickLogic Corporation QUIK, +1.38% the innovator of ultra-low-power programmable Customer Specific Standard Products (CSSPs), today announced that Telepathy Japan Inc., an innovator of product designs in Japan, selected the ArcticLink(R) 3 S2 Sensor Hub for its Telepathy Jumper wearable device. The ArcticLink 3 S2 solution was selected for its ability to deliver always-on, always-aware capabilities while consuming only 150uW of power, and QuickLogic's unique and highly accurate SenseMe(TM) software algorithms that are bundled with the device.
The Telepathy Jumper is an innovative device with a display unit worn in front of the eye. It is designed for consumer and enterprise applications and comes with two software apps, "Eye Connect" and "Talent Buzz." Eye Connect allows easy one-click sharing, between Jumper users, of each other's field of vision. Talent Buzz makes it possible for users to offer knowledge, experiences and skills to one another.
"We are very happy that our sensor hub was selected by Telepathy for its innovative Jumper product," said Andy Pease, president and CEO of QuickLogic. "This design showcases the unique capabilities of our ArcticLink 3 S2 ultra-low power sensor hub and our sensor software algorithms, which can enhance the user experience while extending battery life."
"We wanted to provide an intuitive experience for both our consumer and enterprise markets. The QuickLogic sensor hub allows such an application with effective collection and analysis of information at long battery life," said Kenichi Suzuki, the CEO at Telepathy Japan Inc.
This is good background material.  It fits Bob West's other category and gives it some color..

‘Hidden strong players’ alter smartphone landscape

Smaller competitors with unique strategies threatening Samsung

Feb 04,2015
Samsung Electronics is known for keeping its guard up even when its smartphone business thrives. Chairman Lee Kun-hee often stresses the need for continuous innovation, once telling his employees not to be afraid to overhaul everything other than their wives and children.

Today the tech giant faces one of its biggest challenges ever. Despite high hopes early last year for the Galaxy S5, the diminishing popularity of the smartphone “king” had a major impact on its performance in the second half.

It is already well known that even in the fourth quarter, revenue of Samsung’s mobile communication business tumbled 22 percent year-on-year to 26.3 trillion won ($23.9 billion). Its operating profit in the fourth quarter was down 64 percent to 3.51 trillion won from a year ago.

Even in one of its biggest markets, China, Samsung has lost ground and now ranks third after China’s own Xiaomi and old rival Apple.

According to Statistics Analytics, in the fourth quarter Xiaomi took the top spot in China with a 12.8 percent market share, followed by Apple (10.9 percent) and Samsung (9.8 percent). Apple’s iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus have been big hits with Chinese consumers.

There are growing concerns that Samsung could replicate the demise of once-dominant Nokia.

Bae Eun-joon, a senior analyst at LG Economic Research Institute, says that is likely. However, Bae pointed out the rapid changes in the smartphone ecosystem in a report on so-called hidden strong players.

According to his analysis, smartphone brands are no longer manufacturing, with market entry barriers lowered, Google distributing the free Android operating system and semiconductor companies selling application processors, the brains of smartphones.

There are even companies that assemble and supply semi-finished smartphones with software that the customers choose.

Competition has changed completely, with small and medium manufacturers able to launch a smartphone by hiring one or two engineers.

The analysis also focused on the slowing growth of leading companies and accelerating growth of 48 smaller companies.

The five most notable companies chasing Samsung Electronics behind the scenes are the “local kings.” They are not visible in terms of global market share and seek strategies that avoid competition and attention.
The French brand Wiko is a smartphone company established three years ago. However, its market share exceeds 10 percent in France, surpassing Apple.

In Russia and Ukraine, smartphone leader Fly has grown rapidly in the past few years.
 Tinno Mobile of China, a design house that develops and produces smartphones for 13 comp
And behind these companies there isanies with market shares of more than 10 percent in five countries. It partners with Wiko, Fly, Micromax, Q Mobile in Pakistan and Symphony in Bangladesh.

Tinno Mobile launched the low-end smartphone Android One with Google last June.

Tinno Mobile has already been ranked in the world’s top 10 smartphone makers in 2011 as it sold 14 million units that year.

Last year, Tinno Mobile already has sold 50 million units and it was ranked as the world’s seventh-largest smartphone maker,” said the analyst.

“As Tinno Mobile holds 95 percent of Wiko shares, it has already entered the brand competition.”

China’s Bubugao is also a hidden player, but its capacity is formidable. Bubugao, which was an audio manufacturer, entered the smartphone business in 2011 and established Vivo and Oppo.

Vivo is the sixth-largest smartphone maker in China and Oppo is No. 7. Bubugao did not stop here, starting One Plus through Oppo in order to chase after Xiaomi.

“When combining the performances of Vivo, Oppo and One Plus through the divestiture strategy, its sales for the first three quarters of 2014 were 28 million units, only 1.4 million behind Huawei,” said a spokesman for the LG Economic Research Institute. “When combining the performances of the three companies, their performance approaches that of Sony as the world’s ninth-largest smartphone maker.”

Chinese company TLC, which acquired French telecommunications equipment company Alcatel in 2004, is limiting its dependency on its home market. China sales are 10 percent of its total revenue.

It is focusing on Europe and South America, where Alcatel’s brand awareness is high. It uses its own brand name in China. TLC created a foundation for rapid growth by hiding behind a proven brand.

Foxconn is well known as a company that manufactures devices for Apple. As an affiliate of the Taiwanese Hon Hai Group, it launched a smartphone under the InFocus brand.

Seen as the low-cost model that will compete with Xiaomi, it succeeded in securing 6 percent of the Taiwan market.

“So far, Foxconn said it won’t launch its own smartphone to avoid any conflict with its customers, but it is moving toward the smartphone business with the launch of InFocus,” said an analyst at the institute.

Japan’s Softbank also is recognized as a strong player in the “others” category. 
Its smartphone business began after acquiring global retail company Bright Star, which retails the Avvio and MEU brands Central and South America.

Samsung Electronics’ invitation to the unveiling of its flagship Galaxy S6 on March 1 in Barcelona, Spain.
It is taking a different approach by acquiring U.S.-based telecommunications holding company Sprint and the Indian IT retailer Beetel last year.

Meanwhile, Samsung Electronics said Tuesday it will unveil its next flagship model, the Galaxy S6, on March 1, a day before the opening of the Mobile World Congress.

Samsung Electronics has started distributing invitations for the Samsung Galaxy Unpacked 2015, which shows a thin silver curve on a black background with the quote “What’s Next.”

Market watchers say the silver curve could indicate a metal frame for the S6. Samsung also will launch the Galaxy S6 Edge that will have edge displays on the two vertical sides of the device.

As the company experienced an earnings shock due to the sluggish sales of its Galaxy S5, it is drawing attention whether the new flagship Galaxy series will be able to save the company’s mobile business.

BY KIM HYUN-YEA, KIM JUNG-YOON [kjy@joongang.co.kr]

Tuesday, February 10, 2015

when is QUIK up

DAY 2 - 11 March 2015
TimeTrack
Track Host: John Weir, COO, Wearable Technology Show
9:15amConference welcome and opening remarks
John Weir & Lisa Doerr, The Wearable Technology Show
9:20 amKeynote Presentation – Indiegogo
9:40 amThe Big Debate – What’s the Problem with Wearables?
Battery life, data collection, and functionality are all challenges that wearable technology has to overcome in order to be a must have. Our panel present their possible solutions to these and other road bumps on the horizon.
Moderator: John Weir, COO, Evolve
Panelists: Josh Waddell, VP Mobile Solution Management & Innovation, SAP
10:00amReal world case study
Orientation Sensors for Wearable Applications
Speaker: Frederik Wegelin, Senior Product Manager, Bosch Sensortec
10:25amWearables at Work
Consumer markets have long been a target for wearable technology vendors. Business opportunities though abound, and our panel of experts will look at what wearables can do in the enterprise and what solutions are on offer.
Moderator: Anthony Mullen, Profusion
Panelists: Chalie Isaacs, CTO, Salesforce; Brent Blum, Wearable Lead at Accenture; Gabriel Weiss, Head of Marketing Strategies for Carrier Ductless & VRF, a division of Carrier Corporation and a subsidiary of United Technologies Corporation.
11:15amBREAK
11:45amInternet of Wearable Things 
Over 50 billion devices will be connected by 2020 according to research. This presents significant challenges in storage, data security and analysis. How will wearable technology fuel the "Internet of Things"? Are these devices central to true connectivity and how will businesses overcome the challenges of data storage and ownership? 
Speaker: Saverio Romeo, Senior Analyst, Beecham Research
12:05pmEnergy Harvesting 
The technology allowing devices to capture and convert energy is reaching a tipping point. Can wearables say goodbye to batteries and embrace energy drawn from body movement and heat?
Speaker: Robert Andosca, CEO and Founder, Microgen Systems
12:30pmThe Design Challenges of Wearable Technologies
How to Pack Performance, Power and Advanced Capabilities into a Small Form Factor Device
Speaker: Tim Saxe, CTO Quicklogic
1:00pmLUNCH BREAK
2:00pmThe Big Mash Up
The wearable technology market is split over many sectors from healthcare through to gaming, fitness and lifestyle. This session explores how different industry sectors can learn from one another and cross pollenate their ideas.
Moderator:
Panelists: Ruth Thomson, Head of Consumer Product Development ,Cambridge Consultants
In London  in March... its a big gathering

http://www.wearabletechnologyshow.net/2015-exhibitors

R we speaking?

Yes, you bet, Dr. Saxe, he in demand and that won't stop

http://www.wearabletechnologyshow.net/speakerstype.aspx

Is MCU maker Atmel going there?
No

Who is?

Silicon labs will be there, Freescale will be there.

This is a very big gathering for wearables, every player is going to be there.


| Mobile content and services | Smartphones, tablets, devices
Smartphone sensor fusion will be a key technology for indoor location, says ABI
February 9, 2015 | By Fred Donovan
Smartphone sensor fusion will be a key technology for development of indoor location applications in retail, healthcare and other verticals, judges ABI Research.
So far, only one integrated circuit vendor, InvenSense, has actively invested in location-based sensor fusion, which involves applying algorithms to fuse data from multiple sensors into an accurate estimate of the device’s location.
However, ABI forecasts that the market for smartphone sensor fusion technology will take off over the next few, with more than two billion sensor-fusion-equipped devices being sold by 2019.
“Conditions are perfect for disruptive new entrants. All major sensor IC vendors have identified location-based sensor fusion as important, yet InvenSense is the only company to actively invest in this area.
Not true
This lack of priority is driven by a short-term demand issue, as the indoor ecosystem is not evolved enough to warrant major developer interest. This will create a void, as the aforementioned applications take off over the next two years,” observed ABI senior analyst Patrick Connolly.
ABI believes that there is significant opportunity for start-ups, such as SenionLab, indoo.rs, PathSense and others, to fill the void. More companies behind indoor location apps are looking to these startups because they offer products that are available, free and optimized for indoor location.
“The competitive environment is further complicated by handset vendors like Apple, creating their own location-based sensor fusion solution as part of an always-on ubiquitous offering. This will be disruptive, creating competition and opportunity in equal measures,” added Connolly.
ABI predicts that location-based sensor fusion technology will be included in ICs made by Qualcomm and Broadcom this year and next.
Its an ecosystem sort of platform, and the pieces will get put together.
QUIK has been working on this for some time now.

Monday, February 9, 2015



New Sleep-Tracking Wearables Help Solve Real Medical Problems



177590253-crop
 Getty Images
Every year, nearly a million exhausted people with sleep apnea—a breathing disorder caused when throat muscles relax and block the airway during sleep—get into car accidents, causing over a thousand deaths. Apnea is linked to obesity, heart disease, diabetes, an additional $3.4 billion in medical costs, and $16 billion in auto collision costs. Even though apnea has telltale signs (loud snoring, daytime fatigue), it goes undiagnosed 75 percent of the time.
Why? It’s damned expensive and horrendously inconvenient to diagnose sleep apnea. Polysomnography, the standard medical sleep study, requires a medical technician to attach 22 wires to a person’s body and monitor them all night long. The average cost is nearly $3,000. In the world of high-deductible health plans, that payment comes right out of the patient’s pocket. Follow-up testing to measure the effectiveness of treatment is financially unthinkable. The idea of doing clinical sleep studies once a month to monitor progress is a diagnostic crack-pipe fantasy.
Enter wearables, specifically the “pro-sumer” variety with FDA clearance and clinical backing. Unlike first-generation activity trackers that measure movement and sometimes heartbeat, clinical consumer wearables like the recently releasedSleepImage can measure heart rhythm (ECG), breathing volume, and snoring (through tissue vibration). They can also keep tabs on body movement as well as position—whether a person is sleeping on their back, side, or belly. Algorithms calculate the second-to-second relationship between heart rate variability and breathing variability. This relationship between heart and breathing rhythms, known as cardio-pulmonary coupling, maps to the sleep stages and breathing disruptions that previously only a polysomnogram could measure.
The SleepImage is a small, oval-shaped disc that sticks to the chest near the heart. An electrode on a short wire is also attached a little lower, on the ribs. At the end of the night, a person peels off the wearable, uploads the data to a HIPPA-compliant web site, and sees a breakdown the night’s sleep: stable versus unstable sleep stages, REM sleep, snore count, position and sleep interruptions. A prescription subscription gives a person more detailed clinical data visualizations and gives their doctor enough raw biometric data to distinguish between the cardio-pulmonary patterns of obstructive sleep apnea and other sleep-related breathing disorders.
Pro-sumer wearables—consumer devices that generate clinically relevant biometric data—are not (yet) cheap. The SleepImage is $249. Its consumer-level data service is $99 a year, and its prescription-level data service is $149 per year. But it’s an order of magnitude cheaper than polysomnography, and it’s two orders of magnitude cheaper if used four nights in a row, or once a month for half a year, to see whether measures to address the problem—losing weight, sleeping with a mouthpiece that helps keep the airway open, or a continuous positive air pressure (CPAP) mask—make a measurable difference. The real shift that pro-sumer devices enable is from one-time snapshots to a continuous, long-duration series of views that allow a patient and doctor to adjust tactics and measure the results.
Pro-sumer wearables also move measurement from the lab to the actual environment where a person lives. If the devices get cheap enough, the data makes it possible to tease apart individual sleeping issues and social sleeping problems: a partner’s movements, snores and yes, cover stealing.
In a clinical case study using wearables, researchers stacked husband-and-wife time-series data to observe that the husband’s snoring wasn’t loud enough to wake up his wife. But it was loud enough to disrupt her stable sleep, leaving her wrecked the next day. After the husband was treated for apnea, his wife’s sleep quality improved even more than his did. At long last, the Quantified Self can deliver what snorers’ partners have always wanted: evidence.
Jokes aside, the hope for pro-sumer wearables is that they can transcend the “nice to have” activity data generated by movement trackers and provide the “need to have” data that indicates major medical issues. It’s one thing for a healthy person to tinker with their caffeine intake, room temperature and the thread count of their sheets to see what happens to their sleep. It’s a completely different thing for a doctor and patient to use wearables to addresses life-threatening conditions. That shift has a potentially monumental impact on patients, their sleeping partners, and everyone who shares the road with millions of drowsy drivers.