C. Munger on the choices we have to make.
http://can-turtles-fly.blogspot.com/2009/08/charlie-munger-stock-market-as-pari.html
The model I like to sort of simplify the notion of what goes on in a market for common stocks is the pari-mutuel system at the racetrack. If you stop to think about it, a pari-mutuel system is a market. Everybody goes there and bets and the odds change based on what's bet. That's what happens in the stock market.
Pari-Mutuel Betting System
I'm going to be quoting extensively since it is important to get the thoughts from the source. I hope this doesn't violate some fair-use law or something. (As is usually the case on this blog, all bolded or highlighted text within quotes are by me. I made some slight edits with spacing.)
What is a pari-mutuel betting system? It is a betting system that is used in horse racing, among other activities, which involves pay-offs based on the total pool. An important element of it—this is what I found important for the stock market—is that the odds change based on the bets. Here is Charlie Munger introducing the concept:
Everybody goes there [horse track using pari-mutuel betting system] and bets and the odds change based on what's bet. That's what happens in the stock market.Many will prefer the less risk of the gud horse )(NOD.ol)and the 3/2 payout.
Any damn fool can see that a horse carrying a light weight with a wonderful win rate and a good post position etc., etc. is way more likely to win than a horse with a terrible record and extra weight and so on and so on. But if you look at the odds, the bad horse pays 100 to 1, whereas the good horse pays 3 to 2. Then it's not clear which is statistically the best bet using the mathematics of Fermat and Pascal. The prices have changed in such a way that it's very hard to beat the system.
And then the track is taking 17% off the top. So not only do you have to outwit all the other betters, but you've got to outwit them by such a big margin that on average, you can afford to take 17% of your gross bets off the top and give it to the house before the rest of your money can be put to work.
Some will think they have a mispriced bet and go with the 100 to 1 horse. (* QUIK)
After reading and studying here is the dilemma we( our SAT Bfast club) faced.
Nordic Semi- A very important bit and piece in the coral reef. Many with this expertise have gone, CSR-
Qualcomm Acquires CSR To Accelerate Its Growth In IoT
Quintic-NXP To Acquire Quintic's Wearable And Bluetooth Low
CEVA Acquires RivieraWaves
etc.
I want to own this business. But it has about a 1 billion market cap. Over 10 x valuation of current Bluetooth Smart sales. But the wave is also very large.
Vs QUIK.
clearly Nordic is priced as the good horse and will pay
the good horse pays 3 to 2
QUIK
the bad horse pays 100 to 1,
a very good mental process here
Then it's not clear which is statistically the best bet using the mathematics of Fermat and Pascal.
Think it over for yourselves and put the $$ down.
No comments:
Post a Comment